UPSC Prelims 2017— Question 15

This question from the 2017 Civil Services Preliminary Examination tests Modern India, under History. The central concept is Trade Disputes Act 1929. The Trade Disputes Act of 1929 represented colonial intervention in industrial relations. It restricted strikes in specified circumstances and created machinery for compulsory adjudication through courts or tribunals, reflecting the government’s concern with industrial unrest. The safest way to approach this type of UPSC question is to identify the exact institutional, historical, geographical, scientific or economic proposition being tested and then examine every statement or option independently. A statement should not be accepted merely because it contains a familiar term; the qualifier, scope, date, institution and purpose must all be correct. This is particularly important where the answer choices combine several statements. Option-wise analysis: Option A: This is incorrect. It either accepts a statement that is not supported, rejects a statement that is correct, or identifies the wrong institutional, historical, geographical or scientific association. The error is therefore substantive rather than merely terminological. Option B: This is incorrect. It either accepts a statement that is not supported, rejects a statement that is correct, or identifies the wrong institutional, historical, geographical or scientific association. The error is therefore substantive rather than merely terminological. Option C: This is incorrect. It either accepts a statement that is not supported, rejects a statement that is correct, or identifies the wrong institutional, historical, geographical or scientific association. The error is therefore substantive rather than merely terminological. Option D: This is the correct answer. It matches the verified combination or proposition required by the question and is consistent with the underlying concept explained above. Prelims takeaway: Focus on the exact wording of the proposition, especially restrictive words such as “only”, “all”, “always”, “steadily”, “necessarily”, and references to a particular ministry, institution, law or geographical location. For statement-based questions, determine the truth value of each statement before looking at the combination codes. For direct questions, identify the defining feature of the concept and eliminate options that belong to a related but different concept. This method reduces dependence on guesswork and makes elimination more reliable.